Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Wal-Mart slashes iPhone 5 and iPad prices

It looks like a regular iPhone 5, but it's half-off at Wal-Mart.
IPhone discounts are typical this time of year, but Wal-Mart's will be tough to beat.
The retail giant said it has slashed the price of the 16 gigabyte iPhone 5 to $98. Wal-Mart (WMT, Fortune 500) had previously offered it for $129 -- still far cheaper than the usual $200 price tag of the iPhone 5. To get the discount, customers will need to sign a new two-year contract with AT&T (T, Fortune 500), Verizon (VZ, Fortune 500) or Sprint (S, Fortune 500).
Wal-Mart also cut $50 off the price of its 10-inch iPads. The latest iPad with Retina Display now costs $449 and the price of the iPad 2 is $349. The $330 iPad mini did not get a discount.
The price cuts come as Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) is widely expected to be unveiling a new iPhone and possibly a new iPad on Sept. 10. Retailers often slash prices to clear out inventory ahead of a new product launch.
Related story: Selling your old iPhone? Do it now.
RadioShack (RSH) is currently offering a $50 discount on all iPhones, including the iPhone 4S and iPhone 4, and customers don't need to sign a new contract to get the price-cut. T-Mobile (TMUS) is offering the iPhone 5 for $149 with a new two-year payment plan.
And like Wal-Mart, Best Buy (BBY, Fortune 500) is offering $100 off the iPhone 5, but customers need to trade in their old iPhone to get the deal -- not such a bargain when you consider older iPhones are fetching as much as $300 in some channels.
But Wal-Mart's deal undercuts all of them.
The retailer also cut the price of the iPhone 4S to $39, down from $89. Most iPhone 4S smartphones sell for $100 with a new contract.
At the same time, Wal-Mart slashed the price of the Samsung Galaxy S4 to $138, a $10 price cut on the Verizon version and a $30 discount on the AT&T edition.

Sunday, September 1, 2013

How teens, parents struggle to share social media

Carly and her mom are friends on Facebook, but that doesn't mean they share everything.
The 17-year-old from Marin County, California, has refined her Facebook privacy settings so that her mother can't see all the posts that fill her Timeline. Her father, meanwhile, never checks the social network.
"Right now, my mom can only see things that I post. She can't see anything I'm tagged in or anything that my friends say to me on my profile," said Carly, a high school senior who asked to be identified only by her first name. "She doesn't know that, though. I'm like, 80% sure that every other teenager has done that too."
With teen-agers and their parents (grandparents, even) increasingly active on social networks, both generations are joined in a delicate dance over privacy, safety and freedom of expression online.
Interviews with a handful of teens and adults suggest that some teens seek out corners of social media where they can communicate with their friends and peers away from the watchful eye, or embarrassing comments, of their parents.
Facebook is the most commonly used social network for both parents and teen-agers, although many teens increasingly are elsewhere.
Facebook is the most commonly used social network for both parents and teen-agers, although many teens increasingly are elsewhere.
Parents, meanwhile, are grappling with how to monitor their kids' online activity and keep them safe without being stifling or intrusive. And both are seeking ways to coexist peacefully on the few social networks they do share.
Reputation is everything
Today's teenagers are social media natives. They've grown up putting their personal information online and are comfortable sharing photos and videos of themselves, updating relationship statuses and checking into locations.
What they don't share their parents' level of concern about privacy and worries about companies or the government abusing their data. According to a recent study by the Pew Internet and American Life Project, only 9% of teens reported being "very concerned" about third parties accessing their data.
That doesn't mean they're reckless with their personal information, according to Pew research. Most teens exert careful control over what information is seen by whom, but more because they are acutely aware of how each nugget of posted information, even the number of likes it can get, shapes how they are perceived by peers.

"I really try to not have any pictures of me from any parties or any captions/comments with swear words ..."
Carly, age 17

Pew found that teens have developed a variety of ways to control their privacy. They are comfortable navigating Facebook's notoriously complicated privacy settings, and only 14% have public-facing Facebook profiles. They also edit what appears on their profile, deleting posts, comments and unwanted tags.
For teens looking to hide social-media activity from adults, elaborate privacy settings can sometimes be unnecessary. Fifty-eight percent of teens said they posted updates that were inside jokes or coded messages that only certain friends would understand.
Seeking out new online homes
Many teens are learning how to compartmentalize the different parts of their lives online. Facebook is the most popular site for both teens and parents, according to Pew, but teens reported "waning enthusiasm" in the site in Pew focus groups. They cited the colonization of the site by adults and excessive amounts of "drama."
Some teens use Facebook for public posts but message each other on lesser-known social platforms that their parents aren't aware of or haven't signed up for.
Many teens are also on Twitter, Instagram, Tumblr, Vine and Pinterest -- sites where they report feeling less social pressure and more freedom to express themselves. Twitter has seen rapid growth among young users, while Vine, with its looping six-second videos, is a creative form of messaging for a visually oriented generation.
Even straight-laced LinkedIn is courting teenagers. Earlier this month the social media site for professionals lowered its minimum age to 14 from 18 and announced special new pages for universities, hoping to edge into the college-selection process.
If teenagers really don't want something to be seen, they'll retreat to more private messaging tools such as Kik, WhatsApp or Snapchat, which can be used to send private messages to groups of friends. SnapChat is a mobile app which lets users share photos or videos that disappear after a few seconds. For that reason, it's gained a reputation for promoting the exchange of risqué images.
"On Snapchat ... anything goes!" said Carly, the Bay Area teen. "Snapchat gets a little crazier because it's supposed to be 'erased' after 10 seconds or less. Not sure if that's actually true, but there's definitely a different sense of security with Snapchat than Facebook or Instagram."
Making peace with parents
Some kids and parents say they have worked out ways to share social networks harmoniously.
According to the recent Pew study, only 5% of teens reported setting up filters for their parents, and the majority (70%) are friends with their parents on Facebook.
Julie LaRue and her 16-year-old daughter are both mainly on Facebook, but the two have agreed on some boundaries.
"Her ground rule for me is to not comment on her friends' comments unless they are directed to me, and not to tag her in photos without her consent," said LaRue, who lives in Baldwinsville, New York.
LaRue also stays off of her daughter's other social networks, including Tumblr, Twitter and DeviantArt. In exchange, her daughter is heeding her warnings against sharing personal information online and has promised not to post any photos she wouldn't be comfortable showing her parents.
Along the same lines, Carly's mom will tag her daughter in photos and like her posts, but she doesn't comment much because she knows it's embarrassing to her daughter.
Carly, for her part, tries to keep it clean.
"I really try to not have any pictures of me from any parties or any captions/comments with swear words ... but it's hard to be 100% clean when your entire life is online," she said.

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Extra cost to make Google phone in U.S: $4

Moto X phone: Details make big difference


How much more do you think it would cost to make a smartphone in the United States rather than in China? $50 per phone? $100?

Google made a big splash when it announced the Moto X, the new flagship phone of the company's Motorola division, will be manufactured in Texas. An analysis of the smartphone's internal components by IHS iSuppli on Wednesday revealed that the Moto X costs between $3.50 and $4 more per phone to make than the Apple iPhone 5 or the Samsung Galaxy S4 -- both of which are assembled in China.

"In spite of its 'Made in the USA' label, overall costs are still competitive with similar smartphones," said Andrew Rassweiler, IHS' senior director of cost benchmarking services.

Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It's a remarkable feat at a time when making gadgets and gizmos in the Far East has become the norm.

Manufacturing high-profile devices in America has some precedent: Last year, Apple CEO Tim Cook made the surprising announcement that some of the company's Macintosh production would be shifted to the U.S.

But don't expect a "Made in the USA" revolution. The Moto X is a nice phone, but no one is predicting that it will sell anything close to the volume of iPhones or Galaxy S phones. Similarly, the Macintosh is by far the smallest of Apple's "core four" products in terms of unit sales. Apple sold 17 million Macs in the past four quarters, compared to 138 million iPhones.

And if you assume that it would also cost Apple an extra $4 a phone to make the iPhone in the U.S., that works out to added costs of $550 million -- a non-starter for a company already struggling to stem the tide of shrinking profit margins. That estimate also could be too low because of possible costs involved to enhance domestic manufacturing facilities and train workers.
But at $4 a phone, cost clearly isn't the only issue. The real stumbling blocks are speed and education.

Unlike U.S. plants, Foxconn and other Chinese manufacturing operations house employees in dormitories and can send hundreds of thousands of workers to the assembly lines at a moment's notice. Workers are subjected to what most Americans would consider unbearably long hours and tough working conditions.
That system gives tech companies the efficiency needed to race products out the door. Plus, most of the component suppliers for tech companies are also in China or other Asian countries. That gives companies the flexibility to change a product design at the last minute and still ship on time.

China also has far more skilled engineers than the United States does. Apple has said it requires 30,000 industrial engineers to support its on-site factory workers -- numbers that simply don't exist in America.

Sunday, August 25, 2013

Foursquare deal could be a goldmine for Yahoo


Big data is the latest super-hot tech trend, and Yahoo wants a piece of the pie.
Marissa Mayer & Co. are reportedly courting Foursquare for a partnership involving the startup's valuable trove of location data.

The Yahoo-Foursquare talks are "still fluid," according to the Buzzfeed article, which didn't have details about what such a partnership would look like. Yahoo and Foursquare declined to comment.A deal would make sense for both companies: It could provide Yahoo with data that has the ability to improve various products in its vast portfolio, and it would give the often-maligned Foursquare a huge financial opportunity. Yahoo could easily use Foursquare's data to serve up search results, content and ads based on where is a user is or where they've visited in the past. Microsoft's Bing.com added Foursquare to its results last year.

But if a Yahoo-Foursquare deal takes place, Yahoo has the potential to integrate Foursquare's data more extensively than Microsoft has. Foursquare's mapping and mobile technology could prove valuable to Yahoo's dozens of websites, for example.


Yahoo CEO Mayer has tried to re-define Yahoo as a company devoted to personalizing the Web for its users, from content to email to ads. She wants Yahoo products to become part of users' "daily habits," and she's particularly interested in "localization," mobile, social and video. Foursquare clearly fits into three of those four focus areas.

Foursquare, founded in 2009, lets users "check in" to venues like restaurants to receive tips and discounts. It was once the buzziest startup in Silicon Valley, but for the past few years CEO Dennis Crowley has fought the idea that his company is merely just "check-ins and badges."


Foursquare has amassed a whopping 4 billion check-ins from its 35 million global users, and the company has worked to leverage that user-generated data.
On the user side, Foursquare can tell a beer-guzzling Chicagoan who just got off a plane in Hamburg, Germany, where to go for the best brews in the city.

For businesses, Foursquare can tell local spots how their foot traffic compares with competitors, whether it's better to keep happy hour going until 8 p.m., and even how well the venue fares when it's raining out.

Those finely tuned recommendations, based on deep sources of data that users are happy to turn over, could be of great use to Yahoo.
Judging from past deals, Foursquare could make a boatload on these types of partnerships. Earlier this summer, Google bought social-mapping service Waze for a reported $1.3 billion. The hefty purchase price shows just how valuable billions of points of location data can be.

Monday, August 19, 2013

Yahoo's Marissa Mayer turns heads with Vogue photo shoot

(CNN) -- Since taking the helm of Yahoo after years in Google's upper echelon, Marissa Mayer has been at the center of plenty of talk not focused on turning around the once-mighty Web giant.
As Silicon Valley's most prominent woman, her appearance, her motherhood and the way her policies will affect female employees have all, fairly or not, been the subject of spirited discussion.

Now, a two-page photo spread in September's Vogue magazine has them talking again.
In the photo, Mayer lies upside-down on a backyard lounge chair, wearing a blue Michael Kors dress. Her blond hair fans out at the foot of the chair, her Yves Saint Laurent stiletto heels point toward the top and she holds a tablet computer featuring a stylized image of her face.

In the minds of some, that single image is enough to undo a 3,000-word article -- the first in-depth interview Mayer has granted since taking the reins at Yahoo -- that focuses on her successes and vision in a male-dominated tech world.
"Nothing says, 'I'm a powerful woman' like a photo of you upside down on a weird couch," Stan Horaczek, an editor at Popular Photography, said on Twitter. "Nice work, Vogue."

"Being equal means you can be (feminine) AND smart," wrote online business consultant Angie McKaig. "However, still wincing over Marissa Mayer all stretched out for Vogue."
Some people focused less on the photo and main article than they did on what they deemed a questionable sidebar piece titled "What Would Marissa Mayer Wear?: A Workweek Guide to Office Dressing."

"Marissa Mayer's ascent up the corporate ladder and to the top of the tech world are enough to make her the mentor every working woman wants," the piece reads. "But her uncanny ability to perfectly answer that age-old fashion question: What is work-appropriate? is equally worth emulating."
It follows with a five-panel slideshow of outfits presumably inspired by Mayer.
"Oy... " read the one-sound review of Slate economics reporter Matt Yglesias on Twitter.
Mayer has made no secret of her love for design and fashion. The article, in which writer and Slate Group editor-in-chief Jacob Weisberg calls her an "unusually stylish geek," is her second appearance in Vogue, following a 2009 feature when she was one of Google's top leaders.

Much of the online response on Monday, the first day other publications could run the image, remained focused on the article itself, with much of it praising Mayer and the steps she has taken to begin a turnaround at a once-faltering Yahoo. Others said the photo, like it or not, shouldn't take away from the overall look at Mayer's life and career.

Anna Holmes, founder of women's website Jezebel, argued in a column for Time that "women who hold any position of authority get it coming and going" when it comes to their appearance. Ignore it? You lack self-respect. Focus on it? You're superficial.
If anything, she writes, Mayer's photo and other recent debates "make me yearn for a time when female competence in one area is not undermined by enthusiasm for another -- in which women in positions of power are so commonplace that we do not feel compelled to divine motive or find symbolism in every remark they make, corporate policy they enact or fashion spread they pose for."

In the article, in which Mayer reveals a fondness for even numbers, cashmere boleros, pineapple milkshakes and Candy Crush, she also provides insight into her first year at Yahoo's helm.
On her vision for Yahoo: "Close your eyes and listen to this list. E-mail, maps, weather, news, stock quotes, share photos, group communication, sport scores, games. You're listening to what people do on their mobile phones. And it sounds like a list of what Yahoo does."

On buying blogging site Tumblr: "I've done now between three and four dozen acquisitions in my career ... and I've never seen this kind of lock-and-key fit between two companies. Our demographic is older. Theirs is the youngest on the Web."

On her controversial move to end work-from-home at Yahoo: (In a conversation with Web investor and pioneer Esther Dyson) "Mayer elaborates, a little defensively, on her reasons for the change. She never meant it as any kind of larger statement about society, but simply as the right decision for Yahoo, where by various accounts working from home often meant hardly working. Teams are happier now that absent participants don't teleconference in for meetings. Messages on Yahoo's 'devel-random' e-mail list, the company's informal forum, have lately turned positive. And in perhaps the clearest sign of support, employees have, she tells Dyson, 'stopped leaking my e-mails' to the press."

On getting ahead in Silicon Valley: "I didn't set out to be at the top of technology companies. I'm just geeky and shy and I like to code. ... It's not like I had a grand plan where I weighed all the pros and cons of what I wanted to do—it just sort of happened."

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Google Adds Personalized Search Results for Your Flight Info, Reservations and More

When linked with your Gmail, you can use Google to search for your flight or package status.
The Google search field is about to get to know you and your plans a lot more intimately.
Instead of searching your Gmail or Google Calendar for your flight number or your FedEx package number, soon you'll be able to type in "What's my flight status?" or "When will my package arrive?" right into Google.com, hit Enter and get personalized answers to those questions right at the top of the search results page.
"This will help people get quick answers for things they are looking for across their own stuff," Roya Soleimani, who works with Google's search team, told ABC News. "Rather than making people be their own mini search engine, they are able to search in one search box -- rather than dig through their email or calendar."
Users can type the question into a browser, or they can ask aloud using Google's voice search functionality in a browser or the Android and iOS apps. When the results appear, Google will specify whether they are from your Gmail or your Google Calendar. The service will work only if you are signed in to your Google account in a web browser in Google's app.
It works a lot like Google Now, Google's personal assistant, but instead of Google feeding you the information before you need it, you will be able to ask for what you want. "This is very similar to the things you get in Google Now, but with Now you get many of these things without having to ask. With this you have to ask for this ahead of time," Solemiani said.
The new feature is all part of Google's vision of making computers smarter. Google's head of search Amit Singhal has said numerous times that Google is looking to build a "Star Trek" computer for everyone, one that knows what you want and understands you perfectly when you speak to it.
The new search features will begin to roll out today in the United States, and will take two to three days to reach all U.S. users. If users are worried about privacy or simply aren't interested in using the feature, they can disable it in the Google settings menu.

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Google Glass Is Changing a Quadriplegic's Life

To many, Google Glass seems like an unnecessary, very expensive, odd-looking smartphone accessory. To Aleksandra Blaszczuk, Google's connected glasses are none of those things.
A 26-year-old quadriplegic, Blaszczuk needs assistance with bathing, eating and countless other activities, but the new gadget has allowed her to do things on her own that she didn't think would be possible again.
Before a car accident a year and a half ago, Blaszczuk used her smartphone just like most 20-somethings. She took photos and immediately shared them; she used a maps app to get around in New York City; she quickly Googled things to keep up with conversation. But when she became paralyzed from the chest down, her life changed.
A 26-year-quadriplegic uses Google Glass to snap photos, get directions and search the web
The glasses have made her feel more independent
Her one complaint? The battery life
"Lots of people with disabilities don't have an opportunity to share their stories. I couldn't take pictures before -- I would have to ask someone to do that for me," Blaszczuk told ABC News. "With Glass, there is a whole new sense of self expression – I've been taking pictures and taking video."
She is able to tilt her head back to wake the glasses' small screen and then simply use her voice to control them. "O.K., Glass, take a picture," she can say to snap a photo, and then she can share it to her Google Plus profile – all with just voice commands. Beyond just taking photos and videos, Blaszczuk has been using the glasses, which pair with a phone for Internet connectivity, to make phone calls, get directions and search Google.
"Before I used a Bluetooth headset -- like a 90s Bluetooth headset -- but I'd have to have my assistant put it on. The difference [with Glass] is actually a really big deal because you can always have it on," Blaszczuk, who is currently studying law at Columbia University, said.
Despite being able to use her iPad and iPhone with voice control software and with Siri, she also explained how useful it is to be able to search with her voice and see the results in front of her right eye. "My friends are always looking up things on their cellphones, I can do that now too really quickly," she said. With Glass you can search Google by simply saying "O.K. Glass, what is the weather going to be like tomorrow?"
She is, though, very aware of one of Glass' main drawbacks. "I don't have it on right now because the battery died," she explained. The early Explorer edition of Glass has only about four hours of battery life. "That's one of the main limitations, because I can't plug it in myself."
Still, all of those small tasks have made her feel more independent and more capable without leaning on her caregiver for help. Since getting the glasses about three weeks ago, Blaszczuk went on a camping trip with her friends, the first trip since her accident that she has taken without her assistant.
Google documented the trip in a video to show off the impact the glasses have had. Blaszczuk paid $1,500 for her charcoal-colored-pair glasses, just like the other early Explorers.
"Lots of people with disabilities don't have an opportunity to share their stories."
And "explore" is exactly what she feels like the glasses have enabled her to do.
"The Explorer is with a capital e, but in a real, physical sense it has gotten me to do random things, really explore things," Blaszczuk said. "I went on a tour of Green Point, it was a fun experience. I have literally been doing more exploring."

By ABC News

Sunday, August 11, 2013

More than 100,000 want to go to Mars and not return, project says

More than 100,000 want to go to Mars and not return, project says

(CNN) -- More than 100,000 people are eager to make themselves at home on another planet. They've applied for a one-way trip to Mars, hoping to be chosen to spend the rest of their lives on uncharted territory, according to an organization planning the manned missions.
The Mars One project wants to colonize the red planet, beginning in 2022. There are financial and practical questions about this venture that haven't been clarified. Will there be enough money? Will people really be able to survive on Mars? But these haven't stopped some 30,000 Americans from signing up.
You can see some of the candidates on the project's website, but they're not the only ones who have applied, said Bas Lansdorp, Mars One CEO and co-founder.
"There is also a very large number of people who are still working on their profile, so either they have decided not to pay the application fee, or they are still making their video or they're still filling out the questionnaire or their resume. So the people that you can see online are only the ones that have finished and who have set their profiles as public," Lansdorp said.
The entrepreneur did not specify how many have paid the fees, completed their profiles and configured them as private.

The application process
Anyone 18 or older may apply, but the fee depends on a user's nationality. For Americans, it's $38; if you're in Mexico, however, it's a mere $15.The company said it sets the price based on the gross domestic product per capita of each nation. "We wanted it to be high enough for people to have to really think about it and low enough for anyone to be able to afford it," Lansdorp said.

For the first crew, the Mars One mission will cost $6 billion, Lansdorp said. The idea is for it to be funded by sponsors and media that will pay for broadcasting rights of shows and movies documenting everything from the astronauts' training on Earth to their deployment and colonization of Mars.
Out of the applicants, Mars One said it will select a multicontinental group of 40 astronauts this year. Four of them -- two men and two women -- are set to leave for Mars in September 2022, landing in April 2023. Another multicontinental group of four will be deployed two years later, according to the Mars One plan. None of them will return to Earth.

The astronauts will undergo a required eight-year training in a secluded location. According to the project site, they will learn how to repair habitat structures, grow vegetables in confined spaces and address "both routine and serious medical issues such as dental upkeep, muscle tears and bone fractures."
"What we want to do is tell the story to the world," Lansdorp said, "when humans go to Mars, when they settle on Mars and build a new Earth, a new planet. This is one of the most exciting things that ever happened, and we want to share the story with the entire world."

How will Mars be colonized?

How will Mars be colonized?
Each lander that Mars One sends will be able to carry about 5,511 pounds of "useful load" to Mars, he said. After eight missions, more than 44,000 pounds of supplies and people are expected to have arrived. The capsules themselves, whose weight is not included in that number, will become part of the habitat.
Food and solar panels will go in the capsules. Earth won't be sending much water or oxygen though -- those will be manufactured on Mars, Lansdorp said.
Astronauts will filter Martian water from the Martian soil. "We will evaporate it and condense it back into its liquid state," he said.
"From the water we can make hydrogen and oxygen, and we will use the oxygen for a breathing atmosphere inside the habitat. This will be prepared by the rovers autonomously before the humans arrive."
It sounds like terraforming, a process in which the conditions of a planet are modified to make it habitable, but Lansdorp said it isn't.
"We will create an atmosphere that looks like the atmosphere on Earth, so you could say that we are terraforming the habitat. But to terraform the entire planet, that's a project that will take hundreds and hundreds of years," he added.
A dangerous mission
In spite of the risks of space travel, the Mars One founder said he is convinced of the viability of the project. However, some space travel experts have said the risks are far too high to carry out these manned missions to Mars, a distance that humans have never traveled.
Radiation is a big concern. NASA does not allow their astronauts to expose themselves to radiation levels that could increase their risk of developing cancer by more than 3%.


To maintain the radiation exposure standards that NASA requires, the maximum time an astronaut can spend in space "is anywhere from about 300 days to about 360 days for the solar minimum activity. For solar maximum, in ranges anywhere from about 275 days to 500 days," said Eddie Semones, NASA spaceflight radiation officer.
A round-trip journey to Mars could expose astronauts to the maximum amount of radiation allowed in a career under current NASA standards, according to a recent study by scientists at the space agency. Mars One is planning a one-way journey, which doesn't negate the problem, and being on Mars could expose astronauts to even more radiation, depending on how long they stay and what the shielding conditions are like.
Radiation damages cells' DNA, which can lead to cell death or permanent changes that may result in cancer. However, "there's no convincing human evidence for excess abnormalities in offspring of radiation-exposed adults," Semones said.
While orbiting the Earth, astronauts get exposed to greater concentrations of cosmic background radiation than here on Earth in addition to charged particles trapped in the upper atmosphere and from the sun, said Robert J. Reynolds, epidemiologist at the University of Texas Health Science Center.
As a spacecraft moves into deep space, the people on board would be exposed to even more cosmic radiation and solar particles, which is "fairly dangerous," Reynolds said.
Interestingly, according to Reynolds, astronauts' risk of dying of cancer is lower than that of the general public because they tend to be in shape, eat well, don't smoke and receive careful monitoring from doctors. Of course, none of them have been to Mars.
Semones emphasized that NASA does not study the health effects of Mars colonization and that it's focusing on shorter recognition missions of the surface of Mars. "We're not looking at colonization of Mars or anything. We're not focusing our research on those kinds of questions."


Can it be done?
Mars One isn't the only group hoping to make history by sending people to the red planet. The Inspiration Mars Foundation wants to launch two people -- a man and a woman -- on a 501-day, round-trip journey to Mars and back in 2018 without ever touching down.
501 days in space with your spouse: Could you handle it?
At this time there is no technology that can protect astronauts from an excess of space radiation. "The maximum number of days to stay with our standards is on the order of 500 days. So any mission that would exceed 500 days would not be doable," Semones said.
Reynolds agreed: "At this point it's completely infeasible to try to send someone to Mars unless we can get there faster or we develop better shielding for a spacecraft."
NASA is working on engines intended to cut the travel time to Mars by the 2030s, but those systems won't be ready for many years, Chris Moore, NASA's deputy director of advanced exploration systems, told CNN this year. In the meantime, Moore said engineers could try to limit travelers' exposures by designing a spacecraft in such a way that it provides more protection.
But Mars One founder Lansdorp insisted his group will get people landing on Mars by 2023.
"The risks of space travel in general are already very high, so radiation is really not our biggest concern," he said.
If that all sounds good, you can still sign up.
But remember: You can never go home again.

Friday, August 9, 2013

Oprah Winfrey's brush with racism in Swiss boutique sparks international uproar after employee denied to help her with $38K bag


Oprah Winfrey revealed she had a racist encounter while shopping in Switzerland - and the country's national tourist office issued a public apology for the experience.
Switzerland is trying to make peace with Oprah Winfrey.
The media mogul endured a shocking racist experience during a trip to posh Zurich store while in town last month for Tina Turner’s wedding -- forcing both the boutique’s owner and the Swiss Tourism board to issue public apologies.

Oprah Winfrey (r.) arrives at her hotel in Zurich last month for Tina Turner's wedding celebration weekend.

The international incident occurred when a shop worker at Trois Pommes who didn't recognize Winfrey refused to allow her to see a $38,000 Tom Ford bag on display because she assumed it was beyond the customer's means, instead steering her to cheaper alternatives.
“I say to the woman, excuse me, may I see the bag above your head, and she says to me, ‘No, it’s too expensive,’” Winfrey recounted to Entertainment Tonight Monday night while publicizing her new movie, “Lee Daniel’s The Butler. “She said, no, no, no you want to see this one because that one will cost too much you won’t be able to afford that one.’

Winfrey didn't name the store, but it was later revealed to be a boutique for the fashion label 'Trois Pommes', in Zurich. Winfrey told Entertainment Tonight she wanted a closer look at a handbag selling for around 38,000 dollars, but the seller refused to take it off the shelf, telling Winfrey 'No, it's too expensive.'

“She refused to get it ... she said, ‘ I don’t want to hurt your feelings and I said, ‘Okay, thank you so much, you’re probably right I can’t afford it. Now why does she do that?”
Winfrey, who Forbes estimates earned $77 million in the 12 months between June 2012 and June 2013, said she left without making a scene over the “Jennifer” bag, rather than give the clerk a commission.
Store owner Trudie Goetz shows off her collection of handbags for sale at Tom Ford "Trois Pomme" store. She says it was all a 'misunderstanding.'

“I could have had the big blow up thing and thrown down the black card but why do that,” Winfrey told ‘E.T.’s’ Nancy O’Dell.
But the shop’s owner told Reuters the flap was all a big misunderstanding caused by the shop worker’s imperfect Englishwhile attempting to show Winfrey that the bag came in other styles.
"This is an absolute classic misunderstanding," owner Trudie Goetz told the news agency. "Of course that's not the case (that it was sparked by racism.) Who wouldn't want to sell a purse for 35,000 francs?

In an interview with Switzerland's Blick newsaper, Goetz also publcally apologized to Winfrey for any inconvenience at her store.
The incident comes eight years after Winfrey was turned away from a Hermes store in Paris when she went unrecognized. The high-end boutique later apologized to Winfrey, but claimed the snub occurred because the shop was closed for a private event.
While Winfrey may put her brush with racism behind her, Swiss officials are reeling over the bad publicity the revelation has given their country.
“We are fuming - this person acted terribly wrong. We are sorry this happened to @oprah!,” a rep for the Swiss Tourism office tweeted Thursday.

Monday, August 5, 2013

YouTube 'Spirals' Out of Control With Geek Week Easter Egg


The comedians had a week of YouTube fun last May, but this week the geeks shall inherit the earth. YouTube's own user page is promoting Geek Week by highlighting popular channels and linking to all matters of geekery and nerddom.

Hidden amid the comic books, video games and geek IQ tests are Easter Eggs. Sunday's clue told users (in Huttese, no less) to search for "Use the force, Luke." Those who channeled their inner Jedi found all of YouTube's search entries hovering about the page.

Today's riddle, according to a YouTube statement, includes "seashells, pinecones, artichokes, pineapples." What do these naturally found objects have in common? They all have a number of spirals that relate to the Fibonacci sequence.



11-Year-Old Web Series Star Inspiring Girls in the Name of Science


If it's been awhile since your last math class, the Fibonacci sequence is a series of numbers in which the next number in the sequence is the sum of its two previous entries. The first two entries are 0 and 1, and working from there, you get 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13 and so on. YouTube pointed out in its statement that the numbers in today's date are all in the Fibonacci sequence.

The Fibonacci sequence can also manifest itself in shapes, starting with a square whose sides are 1-inch long. Another 1-inch square branches off the first square, and then a 2-inch square branches off the previous two squares. The branching squares continue onward to infinity.

Connecting the corners of each successive square results in a Golden Spiral, which is clearer in pictures than in words. Look up "Fibonacci" in YouTube, and the search results appear in a Golden Spiral.

YouTube has more stuff hidden up its sleeve. To figure out the remaining Geek Week Easter Eggs, visit YouTube's social media pages. The company posts a clue around 12 p.m. PT to its Facebook, Google+ and Twitter accounts.
by ABCNews

Thursday, August 1, 2013

New Snowden leak: NSA program taps all you do online

(CNN) -- You've never heard of XKeyscore, but it definitely knows you. The National Security Agency's top-secret program essentially makes available everything you've ever done on the Internet — browsing history, searches, content of your emails, online chats, even your metadata — all at the tap of the keyboard.

The Guardian exposed the program on Wednesday in a follow-up piece to its groundbreaking report on the NSA's surveillance practices. Shortly after publication, Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old former Booz Allen Hamilton employee who worked for the NSA for four years, came forward as the source.

This latest revelation comes from XKeyscore training materials, which Snowden also provided to The Guardian. The NSA sums up the program best: XKeyscore is its "widest reaching" system for developing intelligence from the Internet.

The program gives analysts the ability to search through the entire database of your information without any prior authorization — no warrant, no court clearance, no signature on a dotted line. An analyst must simply complete a simple onscreen form, and seconds later, your online history is no longer private. The agency claims that XKeyscore covers "nearly everything a typical user does on the Internet."

"I, sitting at my desk," said Snowden, could "wiretap anyone, from you or your accountant, to a federal judge or even the president, if I had a personal email."

While United States officials denied this claim, the XKeyscore program, as the public understands it, proves Snowden's point. The law requires the NSA to obtain FISA warrants on U.S. citizens, but this is pushed aside for Americans with foreign targets — and this program gives the NSA the technology to do so. The training materials claim XKeyscore assisted in capturing 300 terrorists by 2008.

The Guardian article breaks down how the program works with each activity, from email monitoring to chats and browsing history, and includes screenshots from the training materials.

The Guardian reached out to the NSA for comment prior to publication. The agency defended the program, stressing that it was only used to legally obtain information about "legitimate foreign intelligence targets in response to requirements that our leaders need for information necessary to protect our nation and its interests."

"XKeyscore is used as a part of NSA's lawful foreign signals intelligence collection system," the agency said in its response. "Allegations of widespread, unchecked analyst access to NSA collection data are simply not true. Access to XKeyscore, as well as all of NSA's analytic tools, is limited to only those personnel who require access for their assigned tasks ... .

"In addition, there are multiple technical, manual and supervisory checks and balances within the system to prevent deliberate misuse from occurring. Every search by an NSA analyst is fully auditable, to ensure that they are proper and within the law. These types of programs allow us to collect the information that enables us to perform our missions successfully -- to defend the nation and to protect U.S. and allied troops abroad."

XKeyscore is the second black mark on the NSA's record in the past few weeks. The Guardian's first story uncovered PRISM, a highly controversial surveillance program that reportedly allows the security agency to access the servers of major Internet organizations including Facebook, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Yahoo, YouTube and Skype, among others.

Snowden's information led to a public outcry for transparency, and the U.S. government pushed to declassify more information about PRISM in an effort to paint a clearer picture about the program.

Snowden has been charged with espionage. He is currently holed up in the transit area of Moscow's Sheremetyevo Airport while his request for asylum is under review by Russian immigration authorities, according to Snowden's lawyer.
by CNN

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

FBI wanted to fly Edward Snowden's father to Moscow

The FBI planned to fly the Edward Snowden's father to Moscow to encourage the National Security Agency leaker to come home to the United States, his father told the Washington Post.
But Lon Snowden said he backed out, because it was not clear he would be able to speak to his son.

"I said, 'I want to be able to speak with my son. . . . Can you set up communications?' And it was, 'Well, we're not sure,' " the father told the newspaper.
"I said, 'Wait a minute, folks, I'm not going to sit on the tarmac to be an emotional tool for you.'"

Lon Snowden spoke to CNN on Monday and Tuesday, but did not bring up this incident.

In an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper Snowden Tuesday, the father said he wants the accused leaker to stay in Russia, until he is confident he can get a fair trial in the United States.

"I am not confident at all," Lon Snowden said.
The multiple guilty verdicts handed to leaker Pfc. Bradley Manning increased his unease, although he says his son's case is "completely different."
"I think my son has exercised discretion in the information that he has shared," he said.
Edward Snowden admires Manning, his father said.
"He's an individual who took a stand."
by CNN